• Frio County Judge Rochelle Lozano Camacho, along with other officials, faces charges of vote harvesting, a third-degree felony in Texas.
• The investigation was initiated following allegations of illegal ballot collection and potential targeting of elderly voters.
• Civil rights groups criticize the investigation as politically motivated, intended to suppress Latino voters.

In Frio County, Texas, six individuals, including Frio County Judge Rochelle Lozano Camacho, Pearsall City Council members Ramiro Trevino and Racheal Garza, Pearsall ISD Trustee Adriann Ramirez, former Frio County Elections Administrator Carlos Segura, and Frio County resident Rosa Rodriguez, have been indicted on charges related to vote harvesting and tampering with evidence. These charges stem from an investigation led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton into alleged election fraud, particularly concerning the collection and handling of absentee ballots. The indictments have sparked controversy and raised concerns about voter suppression, particularly within the Latino community.

• What: Six individuals have been indicted on charges related to vote harvesting and tampering with evidence in Frio County, Texas. Vote harvesting involves the collection and submission of absentee ballots by third parties, which is restricted in Texas.
• Who: The key individuals involved are Frio County Judge Rochelle Lozano Camacho, Pearsall City Council members Ramiro Trevino and Racheal Garza, Pearsall ISD Trustee Adriann Ramirez, former Frio County Elections Administrator Carlos Segura, and Frio County resident Rosa Rodriguez. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is leading the investigation.
• When: The indictments were announced on May 1, 2025, following an investigation that included raids in August 2024. The alleged vote harvesting activities occurred in 2022 and 2023.
• Where: The events occurred in Frio County and Pearsall, Texas, which are located near San Antonio.

The indictments in Frio County are significant because they highlight the ongoing debate over election integrity and voter access in Texas. Paxton's focus on prosecuting voter fraud has been met with criticism from civil rights groups, who argue that his efforts disproportionately target minority voters and suppress turnout. The charges of vote harvesting also raise questions about the legality of assisting voters with absentee ballots, particularly within the context of Texas's restrictive voting laws. The case underscores the deep political divisions surrounding election administration and the potential for these issues to become highly charged legal battles.

The people of Texas deserve fair and honest elections, not backroom deals and political insiders rigging the system. Elected officials who think they can cheat to stay in power will be held accountable. No one is above the law.

Violating the privacy or voting rights of our elderly or disabled community members will be met with zero tolerance. Targeting these vulnerable voters to sway an election or secure a political position is a direct attack on the principles of our democracy.

This is voter suppression 101. There’s no vote harvesting going on. There’s nobody creating these ballots. That’s a lie.

The only word I have right now is that it’s ridiculous.

The indictments of Frio County officials for vote harvesting highlight the ongoing tensions in Texas concerning election integrity and voter access. Led by Attorney General Ken Paxton, the investigation has drawn criticism from civil rights groups, who allege it disproportionately targets Latino voters and could suppress voter turnout. These charges, involving public officials and allegations of compensated ballot collection, have intensified the debate around Texas's Senate Bill 1, which criminalizes certain forms of "vote harvesting". While Paxton's office asserts the actions are to ensure fair elections and accountability, critics argue such measures are politically motivated and contribute to voter intimidation. This case will likely further polarize opinions on election laws, the role of law enforcement in elections, and the delicate balance between preventing fraud and ensuring equitable access to the ballot box.